A counter attraction
has been referred to in speaking of the Hôtel Rambouillet, where
a fashionable court was established for the purpose of drawing away
from Ninon the élite who flocked to her standard. Mademoiselle
de Scudery gives a fine description of this little court at Rambouillet
in her romance, entitled “Cyrus.” There was not, and
could not, be any rivalry between the court in the Rue des Tournelles
and that at Rambouillet, for the reason that Ninon’s coterie consisted
of men exclusively, while that of Rambouillet was thronged with
women. But this, quite naturally, occasioned much envy and
jealousy among the ladies who devised all sorts of entertainments
to attract masculine society. One of their performances was
the famous “Julia Garland,” so named in honor of Mademoiselle de
Rambouillet, who was known by the name of “Julie d’Angennes.”
Each one selected a favorite flower, wrote a sonnet in its praise,
and when all were ready, they stood around Mademoiselle de Rambouillet
in a circle and alternately recited the poem, the reward for the
best one being the favor of some fair lady. Among those who
were drawn to the Hôtel Rambouillet by this pleasing entertainment
was the Duke d’Enghien, afterward known as the “Great Condé,” prince
of the highest renown as a victorious warrior. He was a great
acquisition, and the Garland Play was repeated every night in the
expectation that his pleasure would continue, and the constant attraction
prove adequate to hold him. Once or twice, however, was sufficient
for the Duke, its constant repetition becoming flat and tiresome.
He did not scruple to express his dissatisfaction with a society
that could not originate something new. He was a broadminded
man, with a comprehensive knowledge, but had little taste for poetry
and childish entertainments. But the good ladies of Rambouillet,
unable to devise any other entertainment, persisted in their Garland
Play, until the Duke’s human nature rebelled at the monotony, and
he begged his friends de Moissens and Saint-Evremond to suggest
some relief. They immediately brought him in touch with the
Birds of the Tournelles, with the result that he abandoned the Hôtel
Rambouillet, and found scope for his social desires at Ninon’s house
and in her more attractive society. The conquest of his heart
followed that of his intelligence, the hero of Rocroi being unable
to resist a tenderness that is the glory of a lover and the happiness
of his mistress.
It is a curious fact,
known to some, that all the heroes of Bellona are not expert in
the wars of Venus, the strongest and most valiant souls being weak
in combats in which valor plays an unimportant part. The poet
Chaulieu says upon this point:
“Pour avoir la valeur
d’Hercule,
On n’est pas obligé
d’en avoir la vigueur.”
(“To have the valor of
Hercules,
One need not have his
vigor.”)
The young Prince was
born to attain immortal glory on the field of Mars. To that,
all his training had tended, but notwithstanding his robust physique,
and the indicia of great strength with which nature had endowed
him, he was a weakling in the field of Venus. He came within
the category of a Latin proverb with which Ninon was familiar “Pilosus
aut fortis, aut libidinosus.” (“A hairy man is
either strong or sensual.”) Wherefore, one day when Ninon
was enjoying his society, she looked at him narrowly and exclaimed,
“Ah, Monseigneur, il faut que vous soyex bien fort!” (“Ah,
Monsignor, you must be very strong.”)
Notwithstanding
this, the two dwelt together for a long time in perfect harmony,
the intellectual benefit the Duke derived from the close intimacy
being no less than the pleasure he derived from her affection.
Naturally inclined to deserve the merit and esteem as well as the
love of her admirers, Ninon used all the influence she possessed
to regulate their lives and to inspire them with the true desire
to perform faithfully the duties of their rank and station.
What power over her intimates does not possess a charming woman
disembarrassed of conventional prudery, but vested with grace, high
sentiments, and mental attainments! It was through the gentle
exercise of this power that the famous Aspasia grayed in the soul
of Pericles the seductive art of eloquent language, and taught him
the most solid maims of politics, maxims of which he made so noble
a use.
The young Duke, penetrated
with love and esteem for Ninon, passed at her side every moment
he could steal away from the profound studies and occupations required
by his rank and position. Although he afterward became the
Prince de Condé, the Lion of his time, and the bulwark of France,
he never ceased expressing for her the liveliest gratitude and friendship.
Whenever he met her equipage in the streets of Paris, he never failed
to descend from his own, and go to pay her the most affectionate
compliments.
The Prince de Marsillac,
afterward the Duke de la Rochefoucauld, less philosophical then
than later in life, and who prided himself on his acquaintance with
all the vices and follies of youth, could not long withhold his
admiration for the solid and estimable qualities he perceived in
Ninon, whom he often saw in the company of the Duke d’Enghien.
The result of his admiration was that he formed a tender attachment,
which lasted as long as he lived. It was Ninon who continued
the good work begun, by Madame de La Payette, who confessed that
her social relations with la Rochefoucauld had been the means of
embellishing her mind, and that in compensation for this great service
she had reformed his heart. Whatever share Madame de La Fayette
may have had in reforming the heart of this great man, it is certain
that Ninon de l’Enclos had much to do with reforming his morals
and elevating his mind up to the point it is evident he reached,
to judge from his “Maxims,” in which the human heart is bared as
with a scalpel in the most skillfully devised epigrams that never
cease to hold the interest of every reader.
Chapelle, the most celebrated
voluptuary in Paris, did everything in his power to overcome Ninon’s
repugnance, but without success. There was nothing lacking
in his mental attainments, for he was a poet of very high order,
inimitable in his style; moreover, he was presentable in his person.
Yet he could not make the slightest impression on Ninon’s heart.
He openly declared his love, and, receiving constant rebuffs, resolved
to have revenge and overcome her resistance by punishing her.
This he attempted to do in a very singular manner without regard
to consistency.
All Paris knew his verses
in which he did not conceal his ardent love for Ninon, and in which
were expressed the highest admiration for her estimable qualities
and the depth of her philosophy. He now proceeded to take
back everything good he had said about her and made fun of her love,
her friendship, and her attainments. He ridiculed her in every
possible manner, even charging up against her beauty, her age.
A verse or so will enable the reader to understand his methods:
“Il ne faut pas qu’on
s’ étonne,
Si souvent elle raisonne
De la sublime vertu
Dont Platon f ut revêtu :
Car à bien compter son
âge,
Elle pent avoir vécu
Avec ce grand personage”
Or, substantially in
the English language:
“Let no one be surprised,
If she should be advised
Of the virtue most renowned
Plato to be found:
For, counting up her age,
She lived, ‘tis reason
sound,
With that great personage.”
Ninon had no rancor in
her heart toward any one, much less against an unsuccessful suitor,
hence she only laughed at Chapelle’s effusions, and all Paris laughed
with her. The truth is, la Rochefoucauld had impressed her
mind with that famous saying of his, “Old age is the hell of women,”
and not fearing any hell, reference to her age neither alarmed her,
nor caused the slightest flurry in her peaceful life. She
was too philosophical to regret the loss of what she did not esteem
of any value, and saw Chapelle slipping away from her with tranquility
of mind. It was only during moments of gayety when she abandoned
herself to the play of an imagination always laughing and fertile,
that she repeated the sacrilegious wish of the pious king of Aragon,
who wished that he had been present at the moment of creation, when,
among the suggestions he could have given Providence, he would have
advised him to put the wrinkles of old age where the gods of Pagandom
had located the feeble spot in Achilles.
If Ninon ever felt a pang
on account of the ungenerous conduct of Chapelle, his disciple,
the illustrious Abbé de Chaulieu, the Anacreon of the age, who was
called, when he made his entree into the world of letters, “the
poet of good fellowship,” more than compensated her for the injury
done by his pastor. The Abbé was the Prior of Fontenay, whither
Ninon frequently accompanied Madame the Duchess de Bouillon and
the Chevalier d’Orléans. The Duchess loved to joke at the
expense of the Abbé, and twit him about his wasted talents, which
were more adapted to love than to his present situation. It
may be that the worthy Abbé, after thinking over seriously what
was intended to be a mere pleasantry, concluded that Madame the
Duchess was right, and that he possessed some talent in the direction
of love. However that might have been, it is certain that
he had cast an observant and critical eye on Ninon, and he now openly
paid her court, not unsuccessfully it should be known.
The Abbé Gedoyn was her
last lover so far as there is any account of her amours. The
story is related by Rémond, surnamed “The Greek,” and must be taken
with a grain of salt as Ninon was at that time seventy-nine years
of age. This Rémond, notwithstanding her age, had made violent
love to Ninon, without meeting with any success. Perhaps he
was trying an experiment, being a learned man, anxious to ascertain
when the fire of passion became extinct in the human breast.
Ninon evidently suspected his ardent professions, for she refused
to listen to him and forbade his visits altogether.
“I was the dupe of his
Greek erudition,” she explained, “so I banished him from my school.
He was always wrong in his philosophy of the world, and was unworthy
of as sensible a society as mine.” She often added to
this, “After God had made man, he repented him; I feel the same
about Rémond.”
But to return to the Abbé
Gedoyn: he left the Jesuits with the Abbé Fraguier in 1694, that
is to say, when Mademoiselle de l’Enclos was seventy-eight years
of age. Both of them immediately made the acquaintance of
Ninon and Madame de la Salière, and, astonished at the profound
merit they discovered, deemed it to their advantage to frequent
their society for the purpose of adding to their talents something
that the study of the cloister and experience in the king’s cabinet
itself had never offered them. Abbé Gedoyn became particularly
attached to Mademoiselle de l’Enclos, whose good taste and intellectual
lights he considered such sure and safe guides. His gratitude
soon received the additions of esteem and admiration, and the young
disciple felt the growth of desires which it is difficult to believe
were real, but which became so pressing, that they revived in a
heart nearly extinct, a feeble spark of that fire with which it
had formerly burned. Mademoiselle de l’Enclos refused to accede
to the desires of her lover until she was fully eighty years of
age, a term which did not cool the ardor of the amorous Abbé, who
waited impatiently and on her eightieth birthday compelled his benefactress
to keep her word.
This incident recalls
the testimony of a celebrated Countess of Salisbury, who was called
to testify as an expert upon the subject of love in a celebrated
criminal case that was tried over a hundred years ago in the English
House of Lords. The woman correspondent was of an age when
human passion is supposed to be extinct, and her counsel was attempting
to prove that fact to relieve her from the charge. The testimony
of the aged Countess, who was herself over seventy‑five years
of age, was very unsatisfactory, and the court put this question
to her demanding an explicit answer.
“Madame,” he inquired,
“at what age does the sentiment, passion, or desire of love cease
in the female heart?”
Her ladyship, who had
lived long in high society and had been acquainted with all of the
gallants and coquettes of the English court for nearly two generations,
and who, herself, had sometimes been suspected of not having been
averse to a little waywardness, looked down at her feet for a moment
thoughtfully, then raising her eyes and looking squarely into those
of the judge, answered:
“My Lord, you will have
to ask a woman older than I.”
|